Emblem Pokemon Guild Ragnarok

Golden @

The Golden @ is an award was hitherto in the U.S. and some Latin American countries to internet sites. These sites were divided into categories and chose the best of each one of them.

Infobae Hand in hand with these awards came to Argentina and learned of its existence by a blog regularly to read and comment occasionally. The blog is "I do not think " and is one of the most visited independent news sites and respected, both due to his information as the opinions expressed by its creator, Joseph Benegas .

What surprised me was that the organizers of the Golden @ La Argentina rejected the blog named above. I also learned through "I do not think" who rejected another very good blog called "Compulsive He thinks."

I guess the main criteria for this award to be so crowded with work, could not be paying much attention to both blogs. So I guess, as Double V was ACCEPTED in the contest (my sincere thanks), will be under monitoring. In that case I ask for this post to the judges of the prize for scuttle any kind of suspicion in which they are branded as official or subordinate to the system again to check out the sites mentioned above, surely they will realize that these blogs there is nothing like pornography or the terrorist propaganda or find any other inducement to reject them. From already thank you for your time.

Double V

Colorado Soccer Camps

Who stole Robin Hood?

The legend of the famous English goalkeeper was from the fourteenth century, a source of inspiration for poets, writers, musicians, writers, filmmakers, etc. . With the advent of socialism in the world scene, Robin was also taken as an icon of it, as it saw it as a kind of romantic medieval Che Guevara, this situation came to lead in the era of McCarthyite paranoia stupid book that recounted the stories of the hero of the hood was banned in the U.S..

At this time, and having read or listened to more of a Marxist or Kirchner repeated her favorite book was The Adventures of Robin Hood to consider whether I set the book in question deserves the worship of these characters and I started asking me some questions and arriving at certain conclusions, expressed below.

Your task was to steal from the rich to give to the poor? The answer is yes. But is this character (fictional or real, nobody knows for sure) a bastion of revolutionary communism? would be a matter of breaking down characters, institutions and situations in this story and similar to this, because the proletariat and the bourgeoisie are terms that hitherto did not exist in the imagination of the magician Merlin (which incidentally, has nothing to do in this story) Robin of Locksley ambushed
nobles and clergy to take over their belongings and then distributed them among the commoners. If the time machine (Or to give life to fictional characters) exist, and we bring it to the XXI century Argentina, some argue that the hooded fools would dock industries and companies to share their bounty with the needy, now function performed by the State through kirchneriano taxes and restrictions. Analyzing

the situation well, Robin Hood stole from people unproductive and corrupt institutions instead of getting their money, goods and other luxuries made him work through taxation to expropriation that really worked, whether they farmers or artisans - and also any restrictions imposed trade Is the situation seems familiar?

So what role do you arrogaríamos the character in question in our reality? Let's review: You should steal from the unproductive to wield power, reached by maneuvering through dark and who gained their wealth by using state coercion to really produce. The answer is clear: Robin Hood would have on his office door a gold plaque with the inscription:

Robin of Locksley

Public Accountant

Incidentally, instead of bows and arrows would use tax returns and financial statements misrepresented and his enemies list would be formed by Prince Nestor, La Reina Cristina, El Sheriff Moreno and countless lackeys troupe as vile as these, but have no ability or opportunity to be a privileged place among the supervillains in office.

historical revisionism, which they say ...

Denise Milani Race Track

When the Nazis came ... Alejandro

Martin Niemoeller, (1892 - 1984) German Protestant Pastor


When the Nazis came for the communists, I remained silent
,
because I wasn'ta communist
When jailed the social democrats, I remained silent
,
because I was not social,
When they came for the trade unionists, I did not speak
,
because I wasn'ta trade unionist
When they came for the Jews,
not speak,
because I wasn'ta Jew
When they came for, no one was
but could protest.

Bath Fan Motion Sensor Switches

Rozitchner: "Today is the left fascism"

By Belén Iannuzzi
Source: Infobae.com

wrote scripts and was a columnist Antonio Gasalla both Mariano Grondona as Mario Pergolini. Says the media only show a reality and that equality does not exist.
Are
psychological manipulation from the media?
I do not believe at all in the manipulation hypothesis. I think it's a typical scenario of progressive ignorance.

The case of television is very clear: television is dominated by the mass and not the masses on television. The idea that you can sell anything and you can appeal to anyone with anything is false. Chance literary evenings spend time football to see if you have many advertisers. Express a reality means.

And why there is this idea?
The truth is that the masses are rough, not because all people are dumb but because the amount produced in a mass causes each individual to lose their own characteristics, lose their reality.

The notion of "people" is always fascist is a way in which individuals lose their reality, they lose their differences, their specificity and become rational beings, anonymous, believed, led to a rational and political utility, which may seem very noble but in the concrete and made a mess, it deprive itself each of its potential for development.

I do not start from the basis of equality, people are not all equal and the difference is not democratic: we are all equal and worth all the same; there are people who are better than others, some people are more capable than others. And this has to do with what you can do, what you can feel, what you can invent, what you can live.

What is the "pobrismo?
is an idea I came up with for an article, is the culture of poverty, ie the belief that poverty is a value.

Many think that "if you have no money, is good. If one has money, is bad. The rich are bad, the poor are good. Why is poor is poor? Because it's good. " But being poor is not be good, being poor is being poor.

If we want to ensure that there is less poverty we have to destroy the romanticized, pure, religious and transcendent of poverty, as if being poor was the result of not being traded to the horror of the sensual world and mercantilist.

In my view, be rich (or stop being poor) is to be able to exchange sensual reality. This implies wealth, both material sense. Wealth is therefore a nice gesture as a cell phone. And both are related and belong together.

What is the role of an intellectual in society?
I believe that if an intellectual is not mixed with the world and talk about things that happen and says what he sings and encouraged to say things that in principle does not seem very consistent, if not done, an intellectual of no avail. If you do not want to live broadcasts and displays an affirmative view of reality, is useless. It is a manifestation of poverty, since it is not up to life, the exuberance of life. An intellectual is an artist of ideas, of consciousness.

Many scholars believe that their intelligence is manifested in showing contempt for everything. It is important to express and benches the consequences. When you express destroys the illusion that everyone will love what you do, but it is the best thing to happen.

Many people write me saying I am a fascist. I believe that today fascism is left, no more reactionary position than the left. Society progresses, the left does not.

What books would you recommend someone?
Your Erroneous Zones, by Wayne Dyer, The Antichrist, Friedrich Nietzsche and Change. Formation and resolution of human problems, by Paul Watzlawick.