By Belén Iannuzzi
Source: Infobae.com
wrote scripts and was a columnist Antonio Gasalla both Mariano Grondona as Mario Pergolini. Says the media only show a reality and that equality does not exist.
Are
psychological manipulation from the media?
I do not believe at all in the manipulation hypothesis. I think it's a typical scenario of progressive ignorance.
The case of television is very clear: television is dominated by the mass and not the masses on television. The idea that you can sell anything and you can appeal to anyone with anything is false. Chance literary evenings spend time football to see if you have many advertisers. Express a reality means.
And why there is this idea?
The truth is that the masses are rough, not because all people are dumb but because the amount produced in a mass causes each individual to lose their own characteristics, lose their reality.
The notion of "people" is always fascist is a way in which individuals lose their reality, they lose their differences, their specificity and become rational beings, anonymous, believed, led to a rational and political utility, which may seem very noble but in the concrete and made a mess, it deprive itself each of its potential for development.
I do not start from the basis of equality, people are not all equal and the difference is not democratic: we are all equal and worth all the same; there are people who are better than others, some people are more capable than others. And this has to do with what you can do, what you can feel, what you can invent, what you can live.
What is the "pobrismo?
is an idea I came up with for an article, is the culture of poverty, ie the belief that poverty is a value.
Many think that "if you have no money, is good. If one has money, is bad. The rich are bad, the poor are good. Why is poor is poor? Because it's good. " But being poor is not be good, being poor is being poor.
If we want to ensure that there is less poverty we have to destroy the romanticized, pure, religious and transcendent of poverty, as if being poor was the result of not being traded to the horror of the sensual world and mercantilist.
In my view, be rich (or stop being poor) is to be able to exchange sensual reality. This implies wealth, both material sense. Wealth is therefore a nice gesture as a cell phone. And both are related and belong together.
What is the role of an intellectual in society?
I believe that if an intellectual is not mixed with the world and talk about things that happen and says what he sings and encouraged to say things that in principle does not seem very consistent, if not done, an intellectual of no avail. If you do not want to live broadcasts and displays an affirmative view of reality, is useless. It is a manifestation of poverty, since it is not up to life, the exuberance of life. An intellectual is an artist of ideas, of consciousness.
Many scholars believe that their intelligence is manifested in showing contempt for everything. It is important to express and benches the consequences. When you express destroys the illusion that everyone will love what you do, but it is the best thing to happen.
Many people write me saying I am a fascist. I believe that today fascism is left, no more reactionary position than the left. Society progresses, the left does not.
What books would you recommend someone?
Your Erroneous Zones, by Wayne Dyer, The Antichrist, Friedrich Nietzsche and Change. Formation and resolution of human problems, by Paul Watzlawick.
0 comments:
Post a Comment